Subscribe | Login/Register
19 November 2022
10 September 2022
11 November 2022
12 November 2022
15 November 2022
16 November 2022
17 November 2022
18 November 2022
21 November 2022
Friday 8 May 2020 | Written by Legacy Author | Published in Small World
In late March, French High Commissioner Dominique Sorain and the French Polynesian president Edouard Fritch, declared a nightly nine-hour curfew to tighten the lockdown conditions.
The territory-wide curfew was extended last month until May 13 despite many restrictions having been lifted, which prompted lawyer Thibault Millet to seek a court ruling.
The judges found that the decree was a serious attack on individual liberty and was also patently illegal because there was no evidence of nightly gatherings.
The court also ruled the decree banning meetings of more than 50 people was illegal because the outbreak caused no death and of the 60 people who were infected, 54 no longer showed any symptoms.
Lawyer Millet told Radio 1 that he was pleased to see that that democratic institutions still functioned, even under a state of emergency.
He said at times a balance between security and liberty needed to be found and that was achieved with the court’s decision.
He said his court challenge was not an attack on the High Commissioner’s decisions, which were effective in managing a crisis, but a way to rebalance fundamental rights.