More Top Stories

National
National
League
Athletics
Economy
Rugby league

Moana target 2025 World Cup

11 November 2022

Pacific plan may drain aid budget

Tuesday 26 February 2019 | Published in Regional

Share

Funding for infrastructure bank worries aid groups

PACIFIC – Aid groups in Australia fear the Federal Government is on the verge of taking more money from the strained aid budget to fund a $2 billion infrastructure bank for Pacific island nations.

Prime minister Scott Morrison announced the Australian infrastructure financing facility last year as part of Australia’s “Pacific step up”, which is aimed at combatting rising Chinese influence in the region.

The Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade (DFAT) last week confirmed the bank would be made up of $500 million in grants and $1.5 billion to be funded from the federal budget.

Aid groups maintain there is no fat left to trim in the overall aid budget.

Care Australia chief executive Sally Moyle said a “Pacific step up” shouldn’t stem from an Asia step down.

“Australia cannot be seen as a development partner to be running hot and cold, we’ve got to be a consistent true friend and that doesn’t come from saying, ‘ sorry Cambodia you’re fine now we’re taking the money away’.”

Moyle said it was vital the Pacific infrastructure scheme has safeguards that considered issues such as displacement of communities, gender equality and environmental impacts.

“If you don’t there’s a real risk we might be building white elephants in the Pacific,” she said.

Moyle noted a long history of infrastructure projects across the region that have made things worse for locals.

“Fabulous new highways built that don’t connect to villages, where people are trying to get their goods to the markets, but it does nothing for them, all it does is allows elites to drive around. It doesn’t help poor people,” Moyle said.

The Australian Council for International Development chief executive Marc Purcell said Australia was being foolhardy by “cannabilising the aid budget” and putting at risk relations with key Asian countries.

“We’ve left a trail of damaged relationships. We said we’re helping to alleviate poverty but then we’ve pulled out. What that means is doors are closing to us in Asia,” Purcell said.

Purcell said there was no point building hospitals in the Pacific if there was no consideration for ongoing building maintenance, the availability of skilled medical staff and the cost of wages and petrol generators.

The aid programme has been hit with more than $11 billion in funding cuts since 2013 when the Coalition came to power.

Last year, the government skimmed money from the aid programme to Indonesia and put it towards building an undersea cable for Papua New Guinea and the Solomon Islands.

World Vision chief executive Claire Rogers, who has a background in banking, is worried the government is rushing the bank without proper consultation and involving Pacific communities.

“Any infrastructure projects funded by the new loan facility should be pro-poor, climate resilient, and be bundled with other community development projects to maximise their poverty reduction impact,” she said.

Former minister for the Pacific, Concetta Fierravanti-Wells, was critical of the infrastructure bank in an interview with the Guardian last year, saying she doesn’t want to see “one debtor swapped for another”. - PNC