More Top Stories
Corruption report exposes ‘bribe and sexual favours’
17 January 2023
Bigger and busier 2023: PM
31 December 2022
Double gold for Darts
21 January 2023
Population policy endorsed
10 January 2023
Corruption in the Cook Islands?
21 January 2023
Health ministry focuses on NCDs and mental health
23 January 2023
Te Marae Ora out to prevent dengue outbreak
10 January 2023
Reported domestic ‘violent’ incidents on the rise: Police
23 January 2023
PM Brown vows to change law
23 January 2023
Call for government to address Aitutaki water shortage issue
10 January 2023
Tragedy: Mother drowns trying to save daughter
4 January 2023
‘QR’ effectively becomes ‘KR’
10 September 2022
A year of ‘marked progress’
31 December 2022
Moana target 2025 World Cup
11 November 2022
‘No safety risk’: Airport waiting for funding to swap cracked slabs
12 November 2022
Missing teenager: ‘We’re not sure whether he is still alive’
15 November 2022
Stricter rules for e-cigarettes proposed in Amendment Bill
15 November 2022
We’re halfway there!
16 November 2022
Strategic plan focuses on rehabilitating offenders
17 November 2022
From the river to the ocean
18 November 2022
Pero’s national airline dreams dashed again
19 November 2022
Debate about who should lead fresh water consultation
Friday 10 July 2020 | Written by Rashneel Kumar | Published in Politics
Mark Brown.
The local anti-chlorine group has raised concerns about the appointment of Mark Brown to chair the select committee scrutinising the new water authority law.
The local anti-chlorine group has raised concerns about the appointment of Mark Brown to chair the select committee scrutinising the new water authority law.
To continue reading this article and to support our journalism
CLICK HERE TO SUBSCRIBE NOW
for as little as $11 per month.
- Up to date and breaking news
- Includes access to Premium content
- Videos and online classifieds
Already a subscriber, click here