Accusations fly at tuna meeting

Friday December 08, 2017 Written by Published in Local
More than 700 delegates from more than 40 countries and territories were part of the five days of negotiation to set and update rules for fishing in the Pacific’s tuna-rich waters. 17120532 More than 700 delegates from more than 40 countries and territories were part of the five days of negotiation to set and update rules for fishing in the Pacific’s tuna-rich waters. 17120532

Helen Greig reports on the Western and Central Pacific Fisheries Commission’s meeting in Manila, Philippines.

 

Environment NGOs have delivered a damning indictment of a group of Pacific Tuna Commission members, saying they have deliberately blocked conservation measures for the South Pacific Albacore tuna fishery.

On Wednesday evening (CI time) the Western and Central Pacific Fisheries Commission (WCPFC) were in the final hours of a week-long deliberation focused on new rules governing tropical tuna fishery.

In the past three years moves to improve WCPFC rules for albacore have gone at a glacial pace.

“For years we have listened to impassioned pleas from every Pacific Island state with respect to their declining catch rates of South Pacific Albacore,” said Alfred (buuba) Cook, Western and Central Pacific Tuna Programme Manager on behalf of WWF, Greenpeace and the EDF (Environmental Defense Fund).

But few Distant Water Fishing Nation members have been willing to join Pacific nations to take action, says Cook.

“It seems, despite these impassioned pleas, despite the voluminous scientific and economic evidence put before you, you…don’t…care.

“You don’t care about the domestic industry in the Pacific. You don’t care about the communities in the Pacific Islands that are almost wholly dependent on this resource.

Moreover, you don’t appear to care about the health of the resource.”

The NGOs said most parties around the table had “bent over backwards” to try and accommodate a few demands and these Pacific Tuna Commission members still refused to budge.

“There does not seem to be even a spirit of compromise. What would you agree to, honestly? Because despite the enormous efforts of most of the parties around the table, you continue to postpone adoption of target reference points and now claim that we should just wait for the next stock assessment or the next meeting or the next something, said Cook for the NGOs.

“This, to us, seems like a crass delay tactic designed to buy one more year until you can develop another strategy to delay further. And meanwhile the Pacific industry and the countries that depend on the resource wither and die.

“What additional proof is required to convince you to be a good global citizen and inspire you to recognise your responsibility to the other countries and cultures in this room?

Lastly, this is a disaster of your own making for a few of you.”

The NGOs said despite repeated calls and measures to limit capacity, Pacific Tuna Commission members had put more vessels into the fishery.

“And now, stunningly, you are upset at even the suggestion that you might have to withdraw that capacity and effort in the future.

“If you are worried about the potential impact on your industry, well, it is by your own hand and the rest of the members in this room shouldn’t have to suffer for your poor judgment.”

The NGOs said agreeing to a non-binding workplan left little satisfaction as it only served as another delay.

They called on members to start living up to their collective responsibility to conserve and manage the critically important resource.  

 

Leave a comment